<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Matt Baier Organizing. &#187; findability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mattbaier.com/tag/findability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mattbaier.com</link>
	<description>Your key to unlocking clutter.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 01:56:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Important&#8221; is Not a Category</title>
		<link>http://mattbaier.com/2009/08/important-is-not-a-category/</link>
		<comments>http://mattbaier.com/2009/08/important-is-not-a-category/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 06:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Paper Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[findability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[important files]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mattbaier.com/?p=1360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Effective organizing begins with assigning basic categories, but &#8220;important&#8221; is NOT a category. It may be tempting to think, &#8220;I&#8217;ll just keep all my &#8216;important stuff&#8217; together in one safe place and take my chances with the rest of it.&#8221; This is not a safe practice. Here are 5 reasons why. 1. &#8220;Important&#8221; changes with time. If [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="ngg-singlepic ngg-left alignright" src="http://mattbaier.com//gallery/assorted/280.png" alt="280" width="196" height="196" />Effective organizing begins with assigning basic categories, but &#8220;important&#8221; is NOT a category. It may be tempting to think, &#8220;I&#8217;ll just keep all my &#8216;important stuff&#8217; together in one safe place and take my chances with the rest of it.&#8221;  This is not a safe practice. Here are 5 reasons why.</p>
<p><strong>1. &#8220;Important&#8221; changes with time.</strong> If this is the one system that makes you feel safe then the odds are very good that you don&#8217;t have <a title="the file cycle" href="http://mattbaier.com/2007/04//">a system for disposing of once-important items</a> that have now long expired.  These outdated items build up, burying the truly important items.</p>
<p><strong> 2. Only one tops the pile.</strong> If your most important files go into a pile then only the one at the top can reliably get the most attention.  Slightly older, possibly more important files are likely to get buried by newer, less important files.</p>
<p><strong>3. Findability failure.</strong> It is essential to distinguish between items that you must make a point of acting upon and items you simply need to be able to FIND.  These tend to be bundled together in homes I find employing the &#8221;important&#8221; category.  Important action files are hidden by too many files that simply need to be found easily.</p>
<p><strong> 4. Too much keeping.</strong> Since there is an isolated location for &#8220;important&#8221; items this decreases the likelihood that careful thought will be put into everything else.  When you don&#8217;t have a clear policy about WHY you keep certain things, you tend to keep too much.  If, instead, you keep a minimum of the so called &#8220;less important&#8221; files in a file cabinet of simple categories, then you allow enough space to easily find the &#8220;important&#8221; files.</p>
<p><strong> 5.  Too much is important.</strong> There are simply too many subcategories of &#8220;important&#8221; to make it a manageable size.  Again, this decreases the likelihood that the actionable items will get done.  If you get clear on the junk you don&#8217;t need to keep and set up a <a title="user-friendly filing" href="http://mattbaier.com/2007/06/focus-on-filing-part-2-user-friendly-filing/?preview=true&amp;preview_id=280&amp;preview_nonce=af78c2e975">user-friendly filing system</a>, you can let go of the fear that you&#8217;ll never find an item once it goes into a file cabinet.  What the important file and the less important file share is a need to be findable.  Otherwise, you should ask why you are keeping it at all.</p>
<p>TODAY&#8217;S KEY TO UNLOCKING CLUTTER.  Unlock the &#8220;important&#8221; category and open the door to findability.
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin:10px 10px 10px 0;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmattbaier.com%2F2009%2F08%2Fimportant-is-not-a-category%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmattbaier.com%2F2009%2F08%2Fimportant-is-not-a-category%2F&amp;source=mattbaier&amp;style=normal&amp;service=su.pr&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mattbaier.com/2009/08/important-is-not-a-category/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

